Google

The predictive validity of standardized tests like the SAT and ACT has been called into question. Some research indicates that their effectiveness in forecasting the grade point average (GPA) of first-year college students is substantially exaggerated.

Questionable Predictive Validity of SAT/ACT

Specific research highlights the potential overstatement of the SAT's predictive power. One study suggests that the test's ability to predict future academic performance may be overestimated by a factor as high as 150%.

Overestimation of SAT's Predictive Validity

An admissions officer at a university is reviewing two conflicting reports. Report A shows a positive correlation between the standardized test scores of admitted students and their first-year grade point averages (GPA). Report B, a meta-analysis of several studies, concludes that while this correlation exists, its predictive power is often significantly overstated. Based on the conclusion in Report B, analyze the potential flaw in relying heavily on standardized test scores as the primary tool for forecasting student success.

Interpreting Standardized Test Data in Admissions

Many institutions of higher education have de-emphasized standardized college admissions tests; as of March 2019, more than 1,000 institutions have either relaxed or eliminated the SAT or ACT requirements for admissions (Strauss, 2019).

De-emphasis of Standardized Tests in College Admissions

An admissions officer at a university reviews a study indicating that the ability of standardized tests to forecast students' first-year college grades is significantly weaker than the university's selection model assumes. What is the most direct logical consequence for the university if it continues to place heavy emphasis on these test scores?

Learn Before

Related