An individual can choose combinations of 'consumption now' and 'consumption later'. Their possible combinations are defined by a feasible frontier, and their preferences are shown by indifference curves. They find their optimal choice at Point I, where they consume $35 now and have $63 for later consumption. At this point, their indifference curve is tangent to the feasible frontier. Now, consider a different point on the same feasible frontier, Point H, which involves more consumption now and
0
1
Tags
CORE Econ
Economics
Social Science
Empirical Science
Science
Economy
Introduction to Microeconomics Course
The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ
Related
Evaluating an Optimal Consumption Choice
An individual makes choices about consumption now versus consumption later. Initially, their best possible choice is to consume $35 now and $38 later. After a new investment opportunity becomes available, their feasible set of choices expands, and their new optimal choice is to consume $35 now and $63 later. Which statement correctly analyzes why the new choice represents a better outcome?
Conditions for Optimal Consumption Choice with Investment
An individual is choosing between consumption now and consumption later. They have an investment opportunity where for every $1 of consumption they forgo now, they will have $3 in consumption later. They are currently considering a consumption plan where their personal willingness to trade is such that they would be equally happy to give up $2 of future consumption to gain $1 of present consumption. To reach a more preferred outcome, what should this individual do?
An individual has an endowment of $100 available in one year, and $0 today. They can borrow against this future endowment at a 78% interest rate. If they do this, their most preferred choice is to have $35 for consumption today and $38 for consumption in one year.
Alternatively, they can first undertake an investment project. After accounting for the project's returns, they can then borrow. This new opportunity allows them to reach a different optimal choice: $35 for consumption today and $63 f
An individual has an investment opportunity that yields a 200% return. Their optimal choice is to consume $35 now and have $63 for future consumption. At this specific consumption level, the individual would be willing to give up $1 of current consumption for exactly $3 of future consumption.
Evaluating a Sub-Optimal Consumption Choice
An individual is deciding between consumption now and consumption later. They have an investment opportunity where the rate of transformation is 3: for every $1 of consumption they forgo now, they gain $3 in future consumption. After careful consideration of their personal preferences, they determine their optimal choice is to consume $35 now and have $63 for the future. At this point, their personal willingness to trade off present for future consumption is perfectly aligned with the investment
Determining Personal Preference at the Optimal Point