University of Michigan - Ann Arbor

Our CSCW2020 Paper Abstract should be written here.
- The influx of COVID-19 related papers.
- Hard to catch up for the researchers.
- The COVID-19 pandemic needs to be the priority for CSCW practitioners.
- CSCW tech solutions may be able to offer a valuable solution (call for action)


Reading and Evaluating literature during a Pandemic: A call to action

A placeholder to create offsprings associated with the topic.

Causal Inference & Public Health

Altmetric 

Introduction-- Reading and Evaluating literature during a Pandemic: A call to action

Challenges-- Reading and Evaluating literature during a Pandemic: A call to action

There are some weeks-old efforts do exist. For instance: A search platform with Allen Institute with Google, FB.  But CSCW community may be able to offer a more integrated solution.

CSCW Opportunities-- Reading and Evaluating literature during a Pandemic: A call to action

This node outlines the planned manuscript structure:

0. Abstract — Summarize the study and include CCS Concepts and additional keywords.
1. Introduction — Present the research questions and proposed contributions: how COVID-19 researchers used channels such as social media and preprint servers to move research forward, the challenges they faced, how scientific-publication technology providers responded to increased submissions and screened poor-quality work, and how the findings could inform research-supporting stakeholders.
2. Related Work — Cover preprint servers, peer review, rapid dissemination, reproducibility, contradictory findings, retractions, and potentially relevant science-of-science theories.
3. Method — Describe the qualitative study.
4. Analysis — Present the contextual analysis.
5. Results — Report the findings.
6. Discussion — Interpret the findings and consider design implications.
7. Conclusion — Summarize the study and its implications.

Learn Before

Related