Response to Reardon & Ivey (Chapter 2: Schools)
Chapter 2 discusses the construction of disability in US schooling contexts. It maps DP principles onto Disability Studies in Education (DSE) tenets, allowing researchers to investigate how school interactions/structures continue to "construct some students as disabled".
0
1
Contributors are:
Who are from:
Tags
Disability Studies
Social Science
Empirical Science
Science
Related
Response to O’Reilly (Chapter 3: Mental Health)
Response to D’Ardenne et al. (Chapter 5: Complex Support Needs)
The Systematic Ways U.S. Schools Construct and Perpetuate Disability As Deficit
Poststructuralism and Disability Studies in Education Theories that Ground Critique
Discursive Psychology as the Analytical Tool for Studying Discourse Empirically
How DSE and DP Synthesis Creates New Analytical Possibilities
Disability Studies in Education (DSE) Framework
Intended Outcome for Schools and Students